Terminé

A Phase II Trial of Trastuzumab Plus Weekly Ixabepilone(BMS-247550) and Carboplatin in Patients With HER2/Neu-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

0 critères remplis à partir de votre profilVoyez en un coup d'œil comment votre profil répond à chaque critère d'éligibilité.
Ce qui est testé

trastuzumab

+ ixabepilone
+ carboplatin
Biologique
Médicament
Autre
Qui peut participer

Maladies du sein
+3

+ Néoplasmes du sein
+ Néoplasmes par site
À partir de 18 ans
Voir tous les critères d'éligibilité
Comment se déroule l'étude

Étude thérapeutique

Phase 2
Interventionnel
Date de début : mars 2005
Voir le détail du protocole

Résumé

Sponsor principalNational Cancer Institute (NCI)
Dernière mise à jour : 14 janvier 2026
Issu d'une base de données validée par les autorités. Revendiquer cette étude
Date de début de l'étude : 1 mars 2005Date à laquelle le premier participant a commencé l'étude.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the response rate (as determined by RECIST criteria) to combination therapy with Ixabepilone (BMS-247550), trastuzumab, and carboplatin in patients with metastatic breast cancer known to overexpress HER2. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine time to disease progression (TTP) and time to treatment failure (TTF) after treatment with Ixabepilone (BMS-247550), trastuzumab and carboplatin in patients with metastatic breast cancer known to overexpress HER2. II. To determine the toxicity of combination therapy with Ixabepilone (BMS-247550), trastuzumab and carboplatin in patients with metastatic breast cancer known to overexpress HER2. III. To evaluate overall survival (OS) of combination therapy with Ixabepilone (BMS-247550), trastuzumab, and carboplatin in patients with metastatic breast cancer known to overexpress HER2. IV. To correlate levels of phospho-STAT3 with levels of HER2, Survivin and EGFR expression as measured in tissue by immunohistochemistry. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Induction therapy: Patients receive trastuzumab (Herceptin®) IV over 30 minutes\* on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 and ixabepilone IV over 1 hour and carboplatin IV over 1 hour on days 1, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 6 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. NOTE: \*Trastuzumab is given over 90 minutes on day 1 of course 1 (induction therapy) only. Maintenance therapy: Patients receive trastuzumab IV over 90 minutes on day 1. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for 3 years from study entry. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 10-60 patients will be accrued for this study within 1-6 months.

Titre officielA Phase II Trial of Trastuzumab Plus Weekly Ixabepilone(BMS-247550) and Carboplatin in Patients With HER2/Neu-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer 
NCT00077376
Sponsor principalNational Cancer Institute (NCI)
Dernière mise à jour : 14 janvier 2026
Issu d'une base de données validée par les autorités. Revendiquer cette étude

Protocole

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan de l'étude, y compris la manière dont l'étude est conçue et ce qu'elle évalue.
Détails du design
61 participants à inclureNombre total de participants que l'essai clinique vise à recruter.
Traitement
Cette étude teste un ou plusieurs traitements pour évaluer leur efficacité contre une maladie ou un problème de santé spécifique. L'objectif est de voir si un nouveau médicament ou une thérapie fonctionne mieux, ou provoque moins d'effets secondaires que les options existantes.

Comment les participants sont répartis entre les groupes de l'étude
Dans ce type d'étude, tous les participants reçoivent le même traitement. Comme il n'y a qu'un seul groupe, aucune répartition ni randomisation n'est nécessaire. Ce format est souvent utilisé pour évaluer un nouveau traitement sans le comparer à un autre.

Autres méthodes de répartition
Répartition aléatoire
: les participants sont assignés au hasard, comme par tirage au sort, pour garantir l'équité et limiter les biais.

Répartition non aléatoire
: basée sur des critères spécifiques comme l'état de santé ou la décision du médecin.

Comment les traitements sont administrés aux participants
Dans ce type d'étude, tous les participants reçoivent le même traitement. Ce modèle est utilisé pour évaluer les effets d'une seule intervention, sans comparaison avec un autre traitement.

Autres façons d'administrer les traitements
Affectation parallèle
: les participants sont répartis en groupes recevant chacun un traitement différent.

Affectation croisée
: les participants passent d'un traitement à un autre au cours de l'étude.

Plan factoriel
: les participants reçoivent des combinaisons de traitements pour évaluer leurs interactions.

Plan séquentiel
: les traitements sont administrés successivement selon un ordre prédéterminé, pouvant varier selon la réaction du participant.

Autre type d'attribution
: L'attribution des traitements ne suit pas de schéma standard ni de protocole prédéfini.

Comment l'efficacité du traitement est contrôlée
Dans ce type d’étude, aucun participant ne reçoit de placebo. Tous reçoivent soit le traitement expérimental, soit un autre traitement actif, souvent le traitement de référence. Ce modèle permet de comparer les effets de deux interventions réelles, sans inclure de substance inactive.

Autres options possibles
Contrôlée par placebo
: un placebo est utilisé pour comparer les effets du traitement expérimental à ceux d'une substance inactive, ce qui permet d'évaluer son efficacité réelle.

Comment la nature du traitement est tenue confidentielle
Dans une étude en ouvert, tous les participants ainsi que les chercheurs savent quel traitement est administré. Ce type de protocole est utilisé lorsqu'il n'est pas nécessaire ou pas possible de masquer les traitements.

Autres méthodes de masquage
Simple aveugle
: les participants ignorent le traitement reçu, mais les chercheurs le connaissent.

Double aveugle
: ni les participants ni les chercheurs ne savent quel traitement est administré.

Triple aveugle
: Les participants, les chercheurs et les personnes qui analysent les résultats ne savent pas quel traitement est administré.

Quadruple aveugle
: Les participants, les chercheurs, les personnes qui analysent les résultats et les professionnels de santé en charge du suivi ne savent pas non plus quel traitement est administré.

Éligibilité

Les chercheurs recherchent des patients correspondant à une certaine description appelée critères d'éligibilité : état de santé général ou traitements antérieurs du patient.
Conditions
Critères
Tout sexeLe sexe biologique des participants éligibles à s'inscrire.
À partir de 18 ansTranche d'âge des participants éligibles à participer.
Volontaires sains non autorisésIndique si les individus en bonne santé et ne présentant pas la condition étudiée peuvent participer.
Conditions
Pathologie
Maladies du sein
Néoplasmes du sein
Néoplasmes par site
Néoplasmes
Maladies de la peau
Néoplasmes du sein, masculin
Critères

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the breast which is metastatic and is known to overexpress HER2/neu who have received no prior chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer; prior hormonal therapy for metastatic disease is allowed; NOTE: for this protocol, HER2 overexpression will be defined as 3+ HER2 positivity as measured by immunohistochemistry using the HercepTest (DAKO) or HER2 gene amplification as measured by fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH, e.g. Vysis); representative diagnostic tissue must be submitted for central diagnostic review * Patients must not be pregnant or breast feeding because of the teratogenic potential of these drugs; it is recommended that all females of childbearing potential have a blood test or urine study within 2 weeks prior to registration to rule out pregnancy; women of childbearing potential and sexually active males must be strongly advised to use an accepted and effective non-hormonal method of contraception * Patients must have at least one objective measurable disease parameter; baseline measurements and evaluations using RECIST criteria guidelines must be obtained within 4 weeks prior to registration to the study; NOTE: all areas of disease should be recorded and followed * Patients must have an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 * Patients must be disease free of prior malignancy for \>= 5 years with the exception of curatively treated basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinomas of the skin or carcinoma in situ of the cervix * Patients must not have a history of untreated brain metastasis or brain metastasis currently undergoing radiation; patients with brain metastasis representing the sole site of disease are not eligible for this study; patients with previously treated brain metastasis who have responded to brain radiotherapy and/or surgery and continue in response are eligible provided the brain is not the only site of measurable disease * Patients must not have peripheral neuropathy of any grade * Patients must not have a history of prior severe (grade 3 or 4) hypersensitivity reaction to a drug formulated in polyoxyethylated castor oil (Cremophor EL) * Patients must have left ventricular ejection fraction by MUGA scan or echocardiogram that is at or above the lower institutional limits of normal obtained within 6 weeks prior to registration * Patients must not have a history of New York Heart Association class 3 or 4 heart failure * Serum creatinine =\< 1.5 mg/dl * Granulocytes \>= 1500/mm\^3 * Platelets \>= 100,000/mm\^3 * SGOT(AST) and SGPT(ALT) =\< 1.5 x upper limit of normal (unless liver is involved by tumor, in which case SGOT(AST) and SGPT(ALT) can be =\< 2.0 x upper limit of normal) * Patients must have no history of prior therapy with trastuzumab (Herceptin), Ixabepilone (BMS-247550) or carboplatin for metastatic disease; patients who develop metastatic disease =\< 6 months after completing adjuvant trastuzumab (Herceptin), paclitaxel, docetaxel, carboplatin, or Ixabepilone (BMS-247550) are considered to have had prior therapy for metastatic disease and are excluded from study participation * Patients must not have received a cumulative dose of doxorubicin of greater than 360 mg/m\^2 or epirubicin of greater than 640 mg/m\^2 * Concurrent use of hormonal therapy is not permitted; concurrent radiation therapy is not permitted; hormonal therapy must have been discontinued \>= 1 week prior to registration; radiation therapy must have been completed \>= 2 weeks prior to registration * Patients may have had prior radiation therapy, but the previously irradiated tumors cannot be used to assess a clinical response; patients will not be eligible if they do not have other areas of measurable disease; an exception will be given for patients who have had tumor recurrence in an area that received adjuvant radiation treatments, such as the axilla or chest wall

Plan de l'étude

Découvrez tous les traitements administrés dans cette étude, leur description détaillée et ce qu'ils impliquent.
Groupes de traitement
Objectifs de l'étude
Un seul groupe d'intervention 

est désigné dans cette étude

Cette étude ne comporte pas de groupe placebo. 

Groupes de traitement
Groupe I
Expérimental
Induction therapy: Patients receive trastuzumab (Herceptin®) IV over 30 minutes\* on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 and ixabepilone IV over 1 hour and carboplatin IV over 1 hour on days 1, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 6 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. NOTE: \*Trastuzumab is given over 90 minutes on day 1 of course 1 (induction therapy) only. Maintenance therapy: Patients receive trastuzumab IV over 90 minutes on day 1. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Given IV

Given IV

Given IV

Correlative studies
Objectifs de l'étude
Objectifs principaux

To assess objective response, it is necessary to estimate the overall tumor burden at baseline to which subsequent measurements will be compared. The same method of assessment and the same technique should be used to characterize each lesion at baseline and during follow-up. The best overall response based on RECIST is the best response recorded from registration until disease progression/recurrence, taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded since registration. The best response was determined based on the tumor responses in target and nontarget lesions, with or without new lesions. To be assigned a status of complete or partial response, changes in tumor measurements must be confirmed by repeat assessments performed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response are first met. To be assigned a status of stable disease, measurements must have met the stable disease criteria at least once after study entry at a minimum interval of 8 weeks.
Objectifs secondaires

To assess objective response, it is necessary to estimate the overall tumor burden at baseline to which subsequent measurements will be compared. The same method of assessment and the same technique should be used to characterize each lesion at baseline and during follow-up. The best overall response based on RECIST is the best response recorded from registration until disease progression/recurrence, taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded since registration. The best response was determined based on the tumor responses in target and nontarget lesions, with or without new lesions. To be assigned a status of complete or partial response, changes in tumor measurements must be confirmed by repeat assessments performed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response are first met. To be assigned a status of stable disease, measurements must have met the stable disease criteria at least once after study entry at a minimum interval of 8 weeks.

This interval will be measured from the date of entry on the study to the appearance of new metastatic lesions or objective tumor progression based on RECIST. Patients progression-free at last follow-up were censored.

This interval will be measured from the date of entry on the study to the appearance of new metastatic lesions or objective tumor progression based on RECIST. Patients progression-free at last follow-up were censored.

Time from study entry to the date at which a patient was removed from treatment due to progression, toxicity, refusal or death. If a patient was considered to be a major treatment violation or was taken off study as a non-protocol failure, the patient would be censored on the date he/she was removed from treatment.

Time from study entry to the date at which a patient was removed from treatment due to progression, toxicity, refusal or death. If a patient was considered to be a major treatment violation or was taken off study as a non-protocol failure, the patient would be censored on the date he/she was removed from treatment.

Survival estimate from the Kaplan-Meier curve of the proportion of patients alive at 3 years.

Survival estimate from the Kaplan-Meier curve of the proportion of patients alive at 3 years.

Centres d'étude

Ce sont les hôpitaux, cliniques ou centres de recherche où l'essai est conduit. Vous pouvez trouver le site le plus proche de vous ainsi que son statut.
Cette étude comporte 1 site
Suspendu
Eastern Cooperative Oncology GroupBoston, United StatesVoir le site
Terminé1 Centres d'Étude