Terminé

Feasibility of Retinoic Acid Treatment in Emphysema (FORTE)

0 critères remplis à partir de votre profilVoyez en un coup d'œil comment votre profil répond à chaque critère d'éligibilité.
Ce qui est testé

all trans retinoic acid

+ 13 cis retinoic acid
+ placebo
Médicament
Qui peut participer

Emphysema
+1

+ Lung Diseases
+ Lung Diseases, Obstructive
À partir de 45 ans
Comment se déroule l'étude

Étude thérapeutique

Phase 2
Interventionnel
Date de début : septembre 1999

Résumé

Sponsor principalNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Dernière mise à jour : 16 janvier 2008
Issu d'une base de données validée par les autorités. Revendiquer cette étude
Date de début de l'étude : 1 septembre 1999Date à laquelle le premier participant a commencé l'étude.

To conduct feasibility studies on the use of retinoids in the treatment of emphysema. Specific objectives are to identify optimal patient populations, retinoids, doses, dosing schedules, routes of administration, and outcome measures preparatory to conducting a larger, controlled, clinical trial on the efficacy of retinoid therapy in the management of emphysema. BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which includes chronic bronchitis and emphysema, affects more than 16 million Americans, is the fourth leading cause of death in the USA, and costs the nation billions in direct and indirect health care costs. Though only about two million of the 16 million people with COPD have emphysema, emphysema is more disabling, accounting for approximately half of the 114 million days of restricted activity and half of the 53 million days of disability attributed to COPD per year. Emphysema is characterized by destruction of the air space walls, leading anatomically to abnormal, persistent enlargement of the airspaces distal to the terminal bronchioles, and without obvious fibrosis. The clinical result is continuous dyspnea due to hyperinflation of the lung, over distention of the chest wall, disadvantaged respiratory muscles, and hypoxia, even at rest. Treatment options in emphysema are limited and primarily aimed at symptomatic relief of the dyspnea by maximizing the depleted reserves of the patient. In the late stages, care is supportive, in the form of oxygen therapy, bronchodilator, nutritional supplementation and exercise rehabilitation. Exercise rehabilitation has been shown to improve the quality of life, but only oxygen therapy has been shown to affect survival. For patients less than 60 years old, lung transplantation may be possible, but scarcity of donor lungs and expense greatly limits this option and the efficacy has not been studied. Lung volume reduction surgery is currently under investigation for its effect on symptoms and survival. For the few patients with hereditary alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency, the recent report of the NHLBI supported Alpha-1-Antitrypsin Deficiency Registry Study Group cautions that although those with moderate airflow obstruction may benefit from augmentation therapy, more studies were needed to draw firm conclusions and to answer questions about dose and dosing schedules. Recent laboratory data have shown that all-trans-retinoic acid, a derivative of vitamin A, can regenerate alveoli in adult rats with elastase induced emphysema (Massaro, GD and Massaro D. Retinoic Acid Treatment Abrogates Elastase-induced Pulmonary Emphysema in Rats. Nature Med 3:675-677, 1997). Based upon the findings that prior to septation, rats have fibroblasts rich in vitamin A storage granules, high concentrations of cellular retinol binding protein, and lung nuclear retinoic acid binding receptors, all of which diminish after septation and the fact that retinoic acid increases the number of alveoli in rats, the investigators reasoned that retinoic acid plays a key role in septation. Tracheal instillation of elastase into adult rats resulted in an increase in lung volume, a decrease in surface area, and large alveoli as in human emphysema. Intra peritoneal injection of all-trans retinoic acid in the elastase-treated rats for 12 days prior to sacrifice reduced the lung volume and increased the surface area to normal. In addition to the elastase-treated rats, all trans-retinoic acid has been found to induce formation of alveoli in normal rats, in neonatal rats treated with dexamethasone, which prevents septation, in adult tight skin mice, and in fetal mouse lung in culture. These findings led to interest in the medical community whether adult emphysema patients might get symptomatic relief from treatment with all-trans-retinoic acid. In September 1998, the NHLBI convened a workshop, entitled "Clinical Trial Feasibility: All-trans-Retinoic Acid for the Treatment of Emphysema", to discuss the feasibility of a clinical trial to test the efficacy of retinoic acid in the treatment of emphysema. The workshop participants agreed that the laboratory findings were exciting, but that a proof of principle study was needed to demonstrate whether the laboratory findings could be applied to humans with emphysema. Since there was adequate information about the dose range and toxicity of retinoids in humans, adequate methods for assessing the extent of emphysema, and adequate methods to assess the biological activity and distribution of retinoids in the human lung, the workshop participants thought studies in emphysema patients were possible and appropriate. Several possible populations and retinoids, especially the retinoic acids, were discussed as appropriate for a clinical trial. However, the participants did not think that there was sufficient information available to recommend a single trial design and recommended the conduct of multiple small trials, allowing flexibility in the choice of population, retinoid, doses, and outcomes. DESIGN NARRATIVE: The core study is a multi-center, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial enrolling a total of 300 non-smoking persons with emphysema at 5 participating clinical centers. Study participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three retinoid treatment arms. Within each study arm, participants were randomized to active treatment or to a matched placebo in a 3:1 ratio. After six months of follow-up, the three month crossover period began. Participants initially assigned to active treatment began taking the matched placebo, and participants originally assigned placebo began taking the active treatment. Retinoid treatment arms were all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA trademark, Roche Laboratories, Inc.) at two different doses and 13-cis retinoic acid (cRA, Roche Laboratories, Inc.), each with matched placebo. Several single-center substudies were also performed.

Titre officielFeasibility of Retinoic Acid Treatment in Emphysema (FORTE) 
Sponsor principalNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Dernière mise à jour : 16 janvier 2008
Issu d'une base de données validée par les autorités. Revendiquer cette étude

Protocole

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan de l'étude, y compris la manière dont l'étude est conçue et ce qu'elle évalue.
Détails du design
Traitement
Cette étude teste un ou plusieurs traitements pour évaluer leur efficacité contre une maladie ou un problème de santé spécifique. L'objectif est de voir si un nouveau médicament ou une thérapie fonctionne mieux, ou provoque moins d'effets secondaires que les options existantes.

Éligibilité

Les chercheurs recherchent des patients correspondant à une certaine description appelée critères d'éligibilité : état de santé général ou traitements antérieurs du patient.
Conditions
Critères
Tout sexeLe sexe biologique des participants éligibles à s'inscrire.
À partir de 45 ansTranche d'âge des participants éligibles à participer.
Volontaires sains non autorisésIndique si les individus en bonne santé et ne présentant pas la condition étudiée peuvent participer.
Conditions
Pathologie
Emphysema
Lung Diseases
Lung Diseases, Obstructive
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Critères

1. Men and women \> 45 years. 2. Women of child-bearing potential must agree to use two forms of contraception or abstinence, and undergo monthly pregnancy testing. 3. No inhaled nicotine for \>= 6 months and cotinine \< 20 ng/mL. 4. Best FEV1 \>= 25% of predicted and \<= 80% of predicted on initial screening, using Hankinson's predicted values. 5. DLCO \<= 80% predicted on initial screening, using Crapo's predicted values (corrected for hemoglobin). 6. Spiral CT scan evidence of emphysema: visual impression of at least 10% emphysema on a fixed section of the total lung, and at least 10% of the lung with \< -910 HU. 7. PCO2 \< 45 mm Hg, and willingness to undergo bronchoscopy if FEV1 \>= 30% of predicted.



Centres d'étude

Ce sont les hôpitaux, cliniques ou centres de recherche où l'essai est conduit. Vous pouvez trouver le site le plus proche de vous ainsi que son statut.
Cette étude n'a pas de données de localisationAjoutez cette étude à vos favoris pour savoir quand les données de localisation seront disponibles. 

TerminéAucun centre d'étude