Terminé
CAMP

Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) Phases I (Trial), II (CAMPCS), III (CAMPCS/2), and IV (CAMPCS/3)

0 critères remplis à partir de votre profilVoyez en un coup d'œil comment votre profil répond à chaque critère d'éligibilité.
Ce qui est testé

Placebo

+ Nedocromil
+ Budesonide
Médicament
Qui peut participer

Asthma

+ Lung Diseases
De 5 à 12 ans
Comment se déroule l'étude

Étude thérapeutique

Groupe Placebo
Phase 3
Interventionnel
Date de début : septembre 1991

Résumé

Sponsor principalJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Dernière mise à jour : 3 avril 2014
Issu d'une base de données validée par les autorités. Revendiquer cette étude
Date de début de l'étude : 1 septembre 1991Date à laquelle le premier participant a commencé l'étude.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long term effects of anti-inflammatory therapy compared to bronchodilator therapy on the course of asthma, particularly on lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and on physical and psychosocial growth and development. BACKGROUND: Asthma is a serious chronic condition, affecting approximately 14 million Americans. People with asthma experience well over 100 million days of restricted activity annually, and costs for asthma care exceed $10 billion a year. Asthma is much more prevalent among children than adults. Hospitalizations for asthma have been increasing among children. For example, from 1979 to 1987, the hospital discharge rate with asthma as the first-listed diagnosis rose 43 percent among children less than 15 years of age, from 19.8 to 28.4 discharges per 10,000 population. Death rates for asthma are greater in Blacks than in whites, and the difference is increasing. In 1979, Blacks of both sexes were about twice as likely to die from asthma as whites. Over the past decade this ratio has increased, and by 1987 the asthma death rate was almost three times greater among Blacks than whites. In children, these mortality differences between Blacks and whites are even more striking. Current knowledge about the epidemiology and natural history of childhood asthma is incomplete, but the relationship between asthma early in life and development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in adulthood is becoming more apparent. Asthmatic children with persistent and severe asthma symptoms have lower levels of lung function by young adulthood than those with milder disease. Recent longitudinal studies have confirmed a decrease in rate of growth of lung function as measured by FEV1 among symptomatic (primarily wheeze) children compared to asymptomatic children. Among persons who develop COPD, initial level of lung function is the strongest predictor of subsequent rapid decline of ventilatory function. Thus, less than maximally attained levels of lung function among children with asthma may predispose them to greater than normal decline of lung function later in life. Although the long-term effect of treatment on the course of asthma is not known, the treatment goal of decreasing bronchial hyperresponsiveness and maximizing lung function and growth during childhood may have a beneficial effect on lung health throughout life and prevent progression to irreversible airflow obstruction. Two classes of medications are currently available for treatment of inflammation--corticosteroids and cromolyn sodium. Inhaled corticosteroids have significantly fewer side effects than systemic administration. Corticosteroids do not inhibit the early asthmatic response, but are effective in suppressing the inflammation and bronchial hyperresponsiveness of the late phase response. Long-term studies of inhaled corticosteroids have shown beneficial effects on lung function as measured by FEV1. However, there has been concern about possible effects of long-term use of inhaled corticosteroids. Although epidemiological studies of the use of inhaled corticosteroids have shown no significant adverse effects, large-scale randomized controlled studies of their effects on children's growth and development are needed. When CAMP was initiated in the United States, bronchodilator treatment was the most common approach to therapy. Two classes of bronchodilators, inhaled beta-2-adrenergic agonists and oral theophylline, are most frequently prescribed for asthma. To date, no randomized, controlled studies have compared the two classes of anti-inflammatory medications to each other and to bronchodilator therapy on the course of asthma. The initiative was proposed by the Pulmonary Disease Advisory Committee working group in October 1987 and approved by the full committee at the February 1988 meeting and by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Advisory Council in May 1990. The Request for Proposals was released in October 1990. Awards were made in September 1991. DESIGN NARRATIVE: Children were randomized to one of three treatment groups to receive either: inhaled albuterol alone, albuterol with inhaled budesonide, albuterol with nedocromil. Upon randomization, data were collected on demographic factors, physical and psychosocial development, clinical factors including medical history and extent of allergies, and quality of life factors including limitation of activity, absenteeism from school, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations. All subjects received a common educational program, differing only in the information presented regarding the medication used by the subjects. Each subject was given a standard protocol for dealing with asthma attacks. All subjects were treated and followed for five years with quarterly visits yearly. Recruitment began in July 1993 and ended in June 1995 with the accrual of 1,041 subjects. The study has been extended through June 2011 through three funding phases to observe the subjects but not provide asthma treatment. This will allow CAMP to (1.) determine the full impact of 4 to 6 years of anti-inflammatory therapy on attaining maximal lung function and final height; (2.) examine the natural history of asthma through age 26; and (3.) define patterns of reduced lung function growth and early decline of lung function in young adults.

Titre officielChildhood Asthma Management Program 
Sponsor principalJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Dernière mise à jour : 3 avril 2014
Issu d'une base de données validée par les autorités. Revendiquer cette étude

Protocole

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan de l'étude, y compris la manière dont l'étude est conçue et ce qu'elle évalue.
Détails du design
1041 participants à inclureNombre total de participants que l'essai clinique vise à recruter.
Traitement
Cette étude teste un ou plusieurs traitements pour évaluer leur efficacité contre une maladie ou un problème de santé spécifique. L'objectif est de voir si un nouveau médicament ou une thérapie fonctionne mieux, ou provoque moins d'effets secondaires que les options existantes.

Comment les participants sont répartis entre les groupes de l'étude
Dans cette étude clinique, les participants sont répartis de manière aléatoire, comme lors d'un tirage au sort. Cela garantit l'équité et réduit les biais, rendant les résultats plus fiables. En attribuant les participants au hasard, les chercheurs peuvent comparer les traitements sans influence extérieure.

Autres méthodes de répartition
Répartition non aléatoire
: basée sur des critères spécifiques comme l'état de santé ou la décision du médecin.

Aucune (un seul groupe de participants)
: tous les participants reçoivent le même traitement, aucune répartition n'est nécessaire.

Comment les traitements sont administrés aux participants
Les participants sont répartis en groupes distincts, chaque groupe recevant un traitement différent en même temps. Cela permet de comparer directement l'efficacité de plusieurs traitements.

Autres façons d'administrer les traitements
Groupe unique
: tous les participants reçoivent le même traitement.

Affectation croisée
: les participants passent d'un traitement à un autre au cours de l'étude.

Plan factoriel
: les participants reçoivent des combinaisons de traitements pour évaluer leurs interactions.

Plan séquentiel
: les traitements sont administrés successivement selon un ordre prédéterminé, pouvant varier selon la réaction du participant.

Autre type d'attribution
: L'attribution des traitements ne suit pas de schéma standard ni de protocole prédéfini.

Comment l'efficacité du traitement est contrôlée
Un placebo est utilisé pour comparer les effets du traitement expérimental à ceux d’une substance inactive, ce qui permet d’évaluer son efficacité réelle.

Autres options possibles
Non contrôlée par placebo
: aucun placebo n'est utilisé. Tous les participants reçoivent un traitement actif, souvent le traitement standard, pour permettre une comparaison directe.

Comment la nature du traitement est tenue confidentielle
Les participants, les chercheurs et les personnes chargées de l'évaluation des résultats ne savent pas quel traitement est administré. Cela permet de limiter les biais non seulement pendant l'étude, mais aussi au moment de l'analyse des résultats.

Autres méthodes de masquage
En ouvert
: tout le monde connaît le traitement administré.

Simple aveugle
: les participants ignorent le traitement reçu, mais les chercheurs le connaissent.

Double aveugle
: ni les participants ni les chercheurs ne savent quel traitement est administré.

Quadruple aveugle
: Les participants, les chercheurs, les personnes qui analysent les résultats et les professionnels de santé en charge du suivi ne savent pas non plus quel traitement est administré.

Éligibilité

Les chercheurs recherchent des patients correspondant à une certaine description appelée critères d'éligibilité : état de santé général ou traitements antérieurs du patient.
Conditions
Critères
Tout sexeLe sexe biologique des participants éligibles à s'inscrire.
De 5 à 12 ansTranche d'âge des participants éligibles à participer.
Volontaires sains non autorisésIndique si les individus en bonne santé et ne présentant pas la condition étudiée peuvent participer.
Conditions
Pathologie
Asthma
Lung Diseases
Critères

Inclusion criteria: * Age 5 to 12 years at time of screening * Chronic asthma as evidenced by one or more of the following historical findings for at least 6 months during the past year: * Asthma symptoms at least 2 times per week * 2 or more usages per week of an inhaled bronchodilator * Daily asthma medication * Current asthma symptoms either by diary symptom code of 1 or greater or am or pm PEFR less than 80% of personal best post-bronchodilator value by diary, on 8 or more days during the prn screening period * Methacholine sensitivity: estimated PC20 FEV1 less than or equal to 12.5 mg/ml * Consent of guardian and assent of child * Ability to comply with trial for 5 - 6.5 years Exclusion criteria: * Presence of one or more of the following confounding or complicating problems: * Any other active pulmonary disease * Any chronic condition presumed to interfere with the successful completion of the project or confound its interpretation * Pulmonary function testing findings suggesting a ventilatory defect other than asthma, or evidence of existing irreversible lung damage * Severe chronic sinusitis or nasal polyposis * Introduction of or a change in allergen immunotherapy within the past month * Use of more than 4 sprays of nasal steroids daily (only beclomethasone allowed) * Pregnancy * Current use of metoclopramide, ranitidine, or cimetidine * Treatment for gastroesophageal reflux * Participation in another drug study * Evidence of severe asthma as indicated by one or more of the following: * Two or more hospitalizations for asthma in the past year * Six or more steroid bursts in the past year * Demonstrated need for continuous use of glucocorticoids, either oral or inhaled * When off inhaled O2-agonist for more than 4 hrs and theophylline for more than 24 hrs, FEV1 less than 65% predicted * Intubation for asthma at any time in the past * Need for 9 or more puffs/day of albuterol for each of 3 consecutive days (excluding preventive use prior to exercise), or nocturnal asthma awakenings more than 1.5 times per week on average, or average diary card symptom code greater than 2, or requirement for other medications to control asthma, during prn screening period * Inability to perform 3 acceptable FVC maneuvers of which at least 2 reproducible FEV1s are within 10% of the largest FEV1 * Inability to complete the methacholine challenge or methacholine PC20 FEV1 greater than 12.5 mg/ml * Evidence that patient or family may be unreliable or non-compliant or may move from the metropolitan area before trial completion


Plan de l'étude

Découvrez tous les traitements administrés dans cette étude, leur description détaillée et ce qu'ils impliquent.
Groupes de traitement
Objectifs de l'étude
3 groupes d'intervention 

sont désignés dans cette étude

33,333% de chances 

d'être dans le groupe placebo en aveugle

Groupes de traitement
Groupe I
Comparateur actif
Budesonide (Pulmicort), two 100 microgram puffs bid + two microgram puffs albuterol (Ventolin) prn
Groupe II
Comparateur actif
Nedocromil (Tilade), four 2 mg puffs bid + two 90 microgram puffs albuterol prn
Groupe III
Placebo
Two 100 microgram puffs budesonide placebo bid + two 90 microgram puffs albuterol prn or four 2 mg puffs nedocromil placebo bid + two 90 microgram puffs albuterol prn.
Objectifs de l'étude
Objectifs principaux

Change in FEV1 % of predicted, post-bronchodilator use, from baseline to the end of treatment (4-6 years after randomization). Percent predicted determined from three separate published sets of reference equations for white, black, and Hispanic children - see NEJM 343: 1054-1062, 2000 for more details and references.
Objectifs secondaires

Bronchial responsiveness to serial concentrations of inhaled methacholine solution (mg/ml) as measured by serial ratios of follow-up to baseline FEV1 (forced volume of air expired from the lungs in one second). A dose-response curve is calculated from the serial ratios in relation to the serial concentrations to determine PC20, the concentration associated with a 20% drop from baseline in FEV1; this PC20 is the outcome measure with units mg/ml of methacholine.

Change from baseline proportion of days without asthma symptoms or other asthma related events to proportion of days during the 4-6 years of follow-up. Asthma free days were determined from daily asthma diaries kept from baseline to the end of treatment, 4-6 years later.

Counts during the period of treatment (4-6 years) of visits to emergency rooms or equivalent urgent care settings for asthma treatment.

Counts of deaths from asthma.

Change in standing height from baseline to end of treatment. Standing height is measured three times without shoes using a calibrated Harpenden stadiometer; the average of the three repeated heights to the nearest 0.1 cm is the height measure at either baseline or end of treatment.

Change in total score on the Children's Depression Inventory from baseline to the end of treatment, 4-6 years later. The total score ranges from 0-54 with higher scores indicating greater levels of depression.

Centres d'étude

Ce sont les hôpitaux, cliniques ou centres de recherche où l'essai est conduit. Vous pouvez trouver le site le plus proche de vous ainsi que son statut.
Cette étude n'a pas de données de localisationAjoutez cette étude à vos favoris pour savoir quand les données de localisation seront disponibles. 

TerminéAucun centre d'étude