TMSAssessment of the Neuronavigation System Coupled With Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. A Randomized Double Blind Study
Neuronavigation system
+ Standard localisation method
Trastornos Mentales
+ Trastorno depresivo
+ Trastorno Depresivo Mayor
Estudio de Tratamiento
Resumen
Fecha de inicio: 21 de enero de 2013
Fecha en la que se inscribió al primer participante.Background : Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a new tool for major depressive disorder. rTMS is a non invasive technique allowing for a localized stimulation of cerebral tissue cortex. rTMS uses electromagnetic induction to induce weak electric currents using a rapidly changing magnetic field; this can modify activity in specific or general parts of the brain. Meta-analyses have stated that rTMS appeared to be effective in the treatment of major depression despite any limits concerning sample sizes and methodological concerns. Studies have shown that this technique potentiates antidepressants treatment in combination therapy. It has received FDA approval for the management of major depressive disorder. Stimulation parameters are numerous (frequency, intensity, number of pulses) and their effects are increasingly better understood in order to predict a better balance between efficacy and tolerability. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is the target in repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and the standard (manual) '5-cm method' for positioning the transcranial magnetic stimulation coil over DLPFC is the reference. It has been criticized due to poor targeting accuracies attributed to inter-subject variability. Such an inaccuracy could have consequences as a decrease in rTMS efficacy. Any preliminary findings suggest that a more reproductible and accurate method, based upon a neuronavigation system could allow for a better efficacy. This finding has to be replicated with sound methodology. Objectives: To compare efficacy on mood of coil positioning based upon a neuronavigation device versus coil positioning based upon the standard method. Investigators hypothesized that an accurate localization and stimulation of DLPFC using neuronavigation would be more effective than the less accurate standard method. A secondary objective is to compare the efficacy on patient's self perception, on psychomotor symptoms and the tolerability of the two methods.
Protocolo
Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan del estudio, incluyendo cómo está diseñado y qué se está evaluando.Se reclutarán 107 pacientes
Número total de participantes que el ensayo clínico espera reclutar.Estudio de Tratamiento
Elegibilidad
Los investigadores buscan pacientes que cumplan ciertos criterios, conocidos como criterios de elegibilidad: estado general de salud o tratamientos previos.Cualquier sexo
Sexo biológico de los participantes elegibles para inscribirse.De 18 a 65 años
Rango de edades de los participantes que pueden unirse al estudio.Voluntarios sanos no permitidos
Indica si personas sanas, sin la condición que se estudia, pueden participar.Condiciones
Patología
Criterios
Plan de Estudio
Conoce todos los tratamientos administrados en este estudio, su descripción detallada y en qué consisten.2 grupos de intervención están designados en este estudio
50% de probabilidad de ser asignado al grupo placebo
Grupos de Tratamiento
Grupo I
ExperimentalGrupo II
SimuladoObjetivos del Estudio
Objetivos Primarios
Objetivos Secundarios
Centros del Estudio
Estos son los hospitales, clínicas o centros de investigación donde se lleva a cabo el estudio. Puedes encontrar la ubicación más cercana a ti y su estado de reclutamiento.Este estudio tiene 5 ubicaciones
Centre Santé Mentale Angevin CESAME
Angers, FranceAbrir Centre Santé Mentale Angevin CESAME en Google MapsCHU de Brest
Brest, FranceEtablissement Public de Santé Mentale
Quimperlé, FranceCHGR
Rennes, France